Liste des publications
Publications du département d'ophtalmologie
Bienvenue sur la page dédiée aux publications scientifiques du département d'ophtalmologie du centre médical des Aravis. Notre équipe médicale s'investit activement dans la recherche et l'innovation afin d'améliorer constamment la prise en charge de nos patients. Nos travaux portent sur un large éventail de thématiques, notamment :
Domaines d'expertise
- Les maladies de la cornée, telles que le kératocône, et les techniques chirurgicales associées (greffe de cornée, etc.).
- Les pathologies rétiniennes, comme la DMLA ou le décollement de la rétine, avec une expertise particulière dans les traitements par injections intravitréennes et la chirurgie vitréo-rétinienne.
- L'épidémiologie et la santé publique en ophtalmologie, en utilisant des bases de données nationales pour analyser les tendances et les facteurs de risque de différentes maladies oculaires.
- L'impact des technologies numériques sur la santé oculaire, notamment l'utilisation de la télémédecine pour le dépistage de la rétinopathie diabétique.
Nous sommes fiers de partager ici nos contributions à l'avancement des connaissances en ophtalmologie. N'hésitez pas à consulter nos publications pour en savoir plus sur nos domaines d'expertise et nos recherches en cours.
2024
Mehta, Hemal; Gabrielle, Pierre-Henry; Hashimoto, Yohei; Kibret, Getiye Dejenu; Arnold, Jennifer; Guillaumie, Tremeur; Kheir, Wajiha Jurdi; Kok, Gerhard; Vujosevic, Stela; O'Toole, Louise; Mangelschots, Els; Jaross, Nandor; Ceklic, Lala; Daien, Vincent; Viola, Francesco; Squirrell, David; Lavid, Francisco Javier; Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine; Barthelmes, Daniel; Gillies, Mark; Group, Fight Retinal Blindness! Study
One-year anti-VEGF therapy outcomes in diabetic macular edema based on treatment intensity: Data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry Article de journal
Dans: Ophthalmol. Retina, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 872–879, 2024.
Résumé | BibTeX | Étiquettes: Anti-VEGF; Diabetic macular edema; Pro re nata; Real-world evidence; Treat-and-extend
@article{Mehta2024-mq,
title = {One-year anti-VEGF therapy outcomes in diabetic macular edema
based on treatment intensity: Data from the Fight Retinal
Blindness! Registry},
author = {Hemal Mehta and Pierre-Henry Gabrielle and Yohei Hashimoto and Getiye Dejenu Kibret and Jennifer Arnold and Tremeur Guillaumie and Wajiha Jurdi Kheir and Gerhard Kok and Stela Vujosevic and Louise O'Toole and Els Mangelschots and Nandor Jaross and Lala Ceklic and Vincent Daien and Francesco Viola and David Squirrell and Francisco Javier Lavid and Catherine Creuzot-Garcher and Daniel Barthelmes and Mark Gillies and Fight Retinal Blindness! Study Group},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-09-01},
journal = {Ophthalmol. Retina},
volume = {8},
number = {9},
pages = {872–879},
publisher = {Elsevier BV},
abstract = {PURPOSE: To compare one-year outcomes of eyes with diabetic
macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based
on the proportion of visits where intravitreal vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor injections were
delivered. DESIGN: Cohort study PARTICIPANTS: There were 2288
treatment-naïve eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF
inhibitor therapy from 31 October 2015 to 31 October 2021 from
the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry.
METHODS: Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits
at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n=1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n=1116). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean visual acuity (VA)
change after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The mean (95%
confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment
was 3.6 (2.8, 4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4, 5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (p=0.005). The mean (95% CI)
central subfield thickness (CST) change was -69 (-76, -61)
μm and -85 (-92, -78) μm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (p=0.002). A moderate positive correlation
was observed between the number of injections received over 12
months of treatment and the change in VA (p<0.001).
Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a
moderately greater CST reduction. CONCLUSIONS: This registry
analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to
be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits
in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy.},
keywords = {Anti-VEGF; Diabetic macular edema; Pro re nata; Real-world evidence; Treat-and-extend},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based
on the proportion of visits where intravitreal vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor injections were
delivered. DESIGN: Cohort study PARTICIPANTS: There were 2288
treatment-naïve eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF
inhibitor therapy from 31 October 2015 to 31 October 2021 from
the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry.
METHODS: Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits
at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n=1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n=1116). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean visual acuity (VA)
change after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The mean (95%
confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment
was 3.6 (2.8, 4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4, 5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (p=0.005). The mean (95% CI)
central subfield thickness (CST) change was -69 (-76, -61)
μm and -85 (-92, -78) μm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (p=0.002). A moderate positive correlation
was observed between the number of injections received over 12
months of treatment and the change in VA (p<0.001).
Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a
moderately greater CST reduction. CONCLUSIONS: This registry
analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to
be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits
in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy.
Explorer
Recherche
Mehta, Hemal; Gabrielle, Pierre-Henry; Hashimoto, Yohei; Kibret, Getiye Dejenu; Arnold, Jennifer; Guillaumie, Tremeur; Kheir, Wajiha Jurdi; Kok, Gerhard; Vujosevic, Stela; O'Toole, Louise; Mangelschots, Els; Jaross, Nandor; Ceklic, Lala; Daien, Vincent; Viola, Francesco; Squirrell, David; Lavid, Francisco Javier; Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine; Barthelmes, Daniel; Gillies, Mark; Group, Fight Retinal Blindness! Study
One-year anti-VEGF therapy outcomes in diabetic macular edema based on treatment intensity: Data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry Article de journal
Dans: Ophthalmol. Retina, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 872–879, 2024.
@article{Mehta2024-mq,
title = {One-year anti-VEGF therapy outcomes in diabetic macular edema
based on treatment intensity: Data from the Fight Retinal
Blindness! Registry},
author = {Hemal Mehta and Pierre-Henry Gabrielle and Yohei Hashimoto and Getiye Dejenu Kibret and Jennifer Arnold and Tremeur Guillaumie and Wajiha Jurdi Kheir and Gerhard Kok and Stela Vujosevic and Louise O'Toole and Els Mangelschots and Nandor Jaross and Lala Ceklic and Vincent Daien and Francesco Viola and David Squirrell and Francisco Javier Lavid and Catherine Creuzot-Garcher and Daniel Barthelmes and Mark Gillies and Fight Retinal Blindness! Study Group},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-09-01},
journal = {Ophthalmol. Retina},
volume = {8},
number = {9},
pages = {872–879},
publisher = {Elsevier BV},
abstract = {PURPOSE: To compare one-year outcomes of eyes with diabetic
macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based
on the proportion of visits where intravitreal vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor injections were
delivered. DESIGN: Cohort study PARTICIPANTS: There were 2288
treatment-naïve eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF
inhibitor therapy from 31 October 2015 to 31 October 2021 from
the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry.
METHODS: Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits
at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n=1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n=1116). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean visual acuity (VA)
change after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The mean (95%
confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment
was 3.6 (2.8, 4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4, 5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (p=0.005). The mean (95% CI)
central subfield thickness (CST) change was -69 (-76, -61)
μm and -85 (-92, -78) μm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (p=0.002). A moderate positive correlation
was observed between the number of injections received over 12
months of treatment and the change in VA (p<0.001).
Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a
moderately greater CST reduction. CONCLUSIONS: This registry
analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to
be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits
in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
macular edema (DME) treated in routine clinical practice based
on the proportion of visits where intravitreal vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor injections were
delivered. DESIGN: Cohort study PARTICIPANTS: There were 2288
treatment-naïve eyes with DME starting intravitreal VEGF
inhibitor therapy from 31 October 2015 to 31 October 2021 from
the Fight Retinal Blindness! international outcomes registry.
METHODS: Eyes were grouped according to the proportion of visits
at which an injection was received, Group A with less than the median of 67% (n=1172) versus Group B with greater than the median (n=1116). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean visual acuity (VA)
change after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The mean (95%
confidence interval [CI]) VA change after 12 months of treatment
was 3.6 (2.8, 4.4) letters for eyes in Group A versus 5.2 (4.4, 5.9) letters for eyes in Group B (p=0.005). The mean (95% CI)
central subfield thickness (CST) change was -69 (-76, -61)
μm and -85 (-92, -78) μm for eyes in Group A versus Group B, respectively (p=0.002). A moderate positive correlation
was observed between the number of injections received over 12
months of treatment and the change in VA (p<0.001).
Additionally, eyes that received more injections had a
moderately greater CST reduction. CONCLUSIONS: This registry
analysis found that overall VA and anatomic outcomes tended to
be better in DME eyes treated at a greater proportion of visits
in the first year of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor therapy.